• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102R
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Pain (1994)
Event Date 01/23/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Clinical notes were received indicating the patient was feeling pain in her chest around the vns implant and painful stimulation in her left chest.The neurologist's notes stated the generator battery is likely at its end of life but no battery indicator was noted.The notes also stated the device's impedance value was normal when accessing the vns system, but no impedance value was provided.The patient was referred for generator replacement due to these events.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.No additional or relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
A fax was received from the patient's neurologist that indicated the replacement was related to the painful stimulation and provided recent system diagnostics.Both the generator and lead were subsequently replaced.Both devices have been received.Analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.No additional or relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Product analysis for the returned generator and lead has been completed and approved.The generator's output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs with the generator placed in a simulated body temperature environment.Results showed no signs of variation in the pulse generator¿s output signal and that the device provided the expected level of output current for the entire monitoring period.There was no indication that an end of service condition existed.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.The device performed according to functional specifications analysis concluded proper functionality of the pulse generator and that no abnormal performance or any other type of adverse condition was found.The lead was returned in two portions.Since a portion of the lead (including the electrode array) was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portions.No additional or relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102R
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7304009
MDR Text Key101198542
Report Number1644487-2018-00299
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/11/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/28/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/30/2009
Device Model Number102R
Device Lot Number1972
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/21/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device Age11 YR
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received04/17/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/03/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
-
-