Catalog Number 1125300-23 |
Device Problems
Physical Resistance (2578); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 02/16/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a lesion in the heavily calcified.The lesion was pre-dilated with a 2.5mm balloon catheter.The 3.0x23mm rx xience alpine stent delivery system (sds) was advanced to the lesion with the support of a guidezilla guide catheter, however resistance was noted with the anatomy.The sds was pressurized to deploy the stent and then the sds retracted.It was then noted the stent was not deployed in the lesion.The entire system was removed from the anatomy and it was confirmed the stent had dislodged proximally onto the shaft of the sds.A new alpine sds was used to complete the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported stent dislodgement was identified as stent movement because a portion of the stent remained on the balloon.The reported physical resistance was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely the device interacted with the guiding catheter and/or difficult anatomy during advancement causing the reported physical resistance and subsequent stent dislodgement (stent movement).There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|