(b)(4).This report is being submitted due to a retrospective review conducted under capa (b)(4).On (b)(6) 2016, an fse visited the customer to address the reported event.During servicing, fse cleared and reloaded the software without the parameter settings.Fse then replaced the default settings with a clean set of parameters.During evaluation of the di software, a bug was discovered which was repaired by the di driver software.The instrument was verified as operational.There was no further action required by fse.The most probable cause of the reported event was a corrupt line of coding in data record 8.
|
On (b)(6) 2016, a customer reported they are having interface communication issues with their g8 analyzer.The customer reports that the they believe the specs are inaccurate because the driver parses data based on position and the message does not match spec.Additionally, the customer reports that the instrument is transmitting incorrect data which has happened with a different software version.A field service engineer (fse) was dispatched to address the reported event, which resulted in delayed reporting hga1c patient results.There was no indication of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the delay in reporting.
|