• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. ECLIPSE FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. ECLIPSE FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EC500F
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Malposition of Device (2616); Extrusion (2934)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Thrombus (2101); Great Vessel Perforation (2152)
Event Date 07/30/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Medical records review: the patient at high risk for deep vein thrombosis with progressive pneumoperitoneum was scheduled for inferior vena cava (ivc) filter placement.The right femoral vein was accessed and a venogram was performed which demonstrated the renal vein takeoffs at l2-l3.An ivc filter was deployed at the l2-l3 interspace without complication.Following filter placement, the patient underwent an exploratory laparoscopy with subsequent percutaneous placement of a peritoneal dialysis catheter.Approximately eleven days post filter deployment, the patient underwent ventral hernia repair with mesh.Following surgery, the patient was diagnosed with heparin induced thrombocytopenia and was found to have multiple pulmonary embolism.Approximately fifteen days post filter deployment, ct scan of the abdomen demonstrated thrombus in the ivc extending above the filter into the renal veins.Approximately one year two months post filter deployment, the patient was scheduled for filter retrieval.Ct scan demonstrated a tilted filter.A snare device was unable to snare the filter.Long biopsy forceps were advanced to free the filter head from the ivc wall; however, it was difficult to come into close vicinity of the filter hook.The filter was unable to be retrieved and the decision was made to conclude the procedure.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images were not provided for review.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Based on the medical records, the investigation can be confirmed for tilted filter and removal difficulties.It can also be confirmed that the patient experienced pe after filter implantation, and a clot above the filter.The origin of the pe and the relationship to the filter has not been established in the provided medical records.Additionally, the investigation is inconclusive for perforation of the ivc.Per the provided medical records, the patient had abdominal surgery.Per the instructions for use (ifu), "procedures or activities that lead to changes in intra-abdominal pressure could affect the integrity or stability of the filter." therefore, it is possible the surgery affected the stability or positioning of the filter.Per the provided medical records, the filter was also tilted.A tilted filter could lead to retrieval difficulties.However, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings/potential complications: acute or recurrent pulmonary embolism.This has been reported despite filter usage.It is not known if thrombi passed through the filter, or originated from superior or collateral vessels.Movement, migration or tilt of the filter are known complications of vena cava filters.Perforation or other acute or chronic damage of the ivc wall, filter tilt, filter malposition.Precautions: procedures or activities that lead to changes in intra-abdominal pressure could affect the integrity or stability of the filter.Note: it is possible that complications such as those described in the "warnings", "precautions", or "potential complications" sections of this instructions for use may affect the recoverability of the device and result in the clinician's decision to have the device remain permanently implanted.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that at some time post filter deployment allegedly the filter tilted and perforated into organs.The device has not been removed after an attempted but unsuccessful percutaneous removal procedure.The status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ECLIPSE FILTER SYSTEM - FEMORAL
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key7365647
MDR Text Key103305697
Report Number2020394-2018-00271
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K093659
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Attorney
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/23/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2016
Device Catalogue NumberEC500F
Device Lot NumberGFXA3819
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/26/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/26/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
BENEFIBER, CINNAMON, FLEXERIL, FERROUS SULFATE; COUMADIN; LASIX, CEPHULAC, MAGNESIUM, MULTIVITAMIN, PROTONIX; POTASSIUM CHORIDE, XIFAXAN, SENOKOT, ALDACTONE
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Other;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-