• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY UNKNOWN NEUROENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPE, NEUROLOGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY UNKNOWN NEUROENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPE, NEUROLOGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN-ES
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage, Cerebral (1889); Seroma (2069); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Date 10/30/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that this age is the average age of the patients reported in the article, as the actual age of patients involved was not provided.Please note that this date is based off the date of publication of the article as the actual event date was not provided.[(b)(4)].
 
Event Description
Alexander g.Weil, md , frcsc , aria fallah, md , ms c, frcsc , parthasarathi chamiraju, md , john ragheb, md , and sanjiv bhatia, md.Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization with a rigid neuroendoscope in infants with hydrocephalus.Journal of neurosurgery pediatrics 17 (2016).Doi: 10.3171/2015.5.Peds14692 objective combining endoscopic third ventriculostomy (etv) with choroid plexus cauterization (cpc) has been shown to improve the success rate compared with etv alone in infants (less than 24 months) with hydrocephalus who were treated in developing countries.The authors sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure, using a rigid neuroendoscope, in a single north american center, and to assess whether the etv success score (etvss), the cure children¿s hospital of uganda etvss (cchu etvss), and other pre- and intraoperative variables could predict success.Methods the authors performed a retrospective review of consecutive etv/cpc procedures performed using a rigid neuroendoscope to treat infantile hydrocephalus.The infants underwent the procedure at miami children¿s hospital between january 2007 and 2014, with at least one postoperative follow-up.Duration of follow-up or time to failure of etv/cpc, the primary outcome measure, was documented.A repeat csf diversion procedure or death was considered as a failure of etv/cpc.The time to event was measured using a kaplan-meier analysis.The authors analyzed etvss, cchu etvss, and pre- and intraoperative variables to determine their suitability to predict success.Results eighty-five patients (45 boys) with a mean age of 4.3 months (range 1 day to 20 months) underwent etv/cpc.Etiology included intraventricular hemorrhage of prematurity in 44 patients (51.7%), my elomeningocele (mmc) in 7 (8.2%), congenital aqueductal stenosis in 12 (14.1%), congenital communicating hydrocephalus in 6 (7.1%), dandy-walker complex in 6 (7.1%), postinfectious hydrocephalus in 5 (5.8%), and other cause in 5 (5.8%).Six procedure-related complications occurred in 5 (5.8%) patients, including 2 hygromas, 1 csf leak, and 3 infections.There were 3 mortalities in this cohort.Etv/cpc was successful in 42.1%, 37.7%, and 36.8% of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up, respectively.The median (95% ci) time to etv/cpc failure was 4.0 months (0.9¿7.1 months).In univariate analyses, both the etvss (hazard ratio [hr] 1.03; 95% ci 1.01¿1.05; p = 0.004) and cchu etvss (hr 1.48; 95% ci 1.04¿2.09; p =.028) were predictive of outcome following etv/cpc.In multivariate analysis, the presence of prepontine scarring was associated with etv/cpc failure (hr 0.34; 95% ci 0.19¿0.63; p <(><<)> 0.001).Other variables, such as radiological criteria (prepontine interval, prepontine space, aqueductal stenosis, third ventricular morphology index) and intraoperative findings (ventriculostomy pulsations, extent of cpc), did not predict outcome.Conclusions etv/cpc is a feasible alternative to etv and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in infants with hydrocephalus.Both the etvss and cchu etvss predicted success following etv/cpc in this single-center north american cohort of patients.Reported events.Intraoperative hemorrhage was minimal in 13 patients and moderate in 2 patients.Etv/cpc was unsuccessful in 57.9%, 62.3%, and 63.2% of patients at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, respectively.Two patients developed subdural hygromas, one of which was symptomatic requiring aspiration.This complication occurred in the first half of the study period which was before may 2010.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the outcomes of the study, complications were not related to any device malfunction.In some cases, the channel neuroendoscopes were used to execute the procedure, but the complications were not related to the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN NEUROENDOSCOPE
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPE, NEUROLOGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY
125 cremona drive
goleta CA 93117
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROSURGERY
125 cremona drive
goleta CA 93117
Manufacturer Contact
stacy ruemping
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635260594
MDR Report Key7397922
MDR Text Key104404848
Report Number2021898-2018-00180
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GWG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/30/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN-ES
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN-ES
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/27/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 MO
-
-