• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US RIGIDFIX FEM 3.3MM S/T XPIN; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US RIGIDFIX FEM 3.3MM S/T XPIN; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 210133
Device Problem Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).Associated medwatches [mr#1221934-2018-50497] [mr#1221934-2018-50498] [mr#1221934-2018-50499].
 
Event Description
It was reported that the theatre team ended up using 4 x sets of implants whilst using the rigidfix cross pin set.This is due to a couple of problems that the surgeon encountered: the small pins on the trocar would snap off while trying to drive the trocar/sleeve combination through the alignment jig and into the femur.On two instances, the sleeve ended up fusing to the trocar.On the 4th (and final) implant available, the surgeon made the decision to leave only one pin for fixation (rather than the recommended two pins) due to the problems encountered.In this instance, he said that the fixation still felt good and was confident that the implant would still perform.The whole incident added 30 minutes onto the procedure.All trocars and sleeves have been kept and decontaminated for inspection and can be returned at your request.The hospital have requested that x3 rigidfix cross pin implants be replaced free of charge as this was an incident that was out of their control.I notice that all x4 implants have different lot numbers which makes me question whether the actual alignment jig instrument is causing the problem and wonder if this also needs returning.Would it be possible to change this free of charge please? i have included the reference and of the instrument that was used in the incident and is still currently in use: description: rigidfix soft tissue guide frame ref: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.Both the sleeve and the trocar were jammed together, and were unable to separate, confirming this complaint.Visually, the outer surface of the sleeve and trocar had deep groove marks scratches and nicks, indicating this device was used with a loose fit within the guide frame.The trocar interlocking pins are not present and could¿ve snapped off allowing the sleeve and trocar to cold welded together during drilling.There are two possible root causes for this type of failure, (1) could be that the interlocking pins on the trocar are not fully seated in the sleeve prior to the rotation of the trocar or (2), the guide frame was out of alignment with the sleeve which could lead the frame to bind up with the sleeve/trocar resulting in welding of the two parts.As reported in the complaint the devices received have all different lot numbers.When dissembling/ assembling the user must avoid mismatching the components to the rigidfix kit, mismatching of the plate numbers will cause the device to fail during use, however no information has been provided.This failure can be attributed to user technique.The dhr review indicated that this batch of devices were processed without incident, therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the records reviewed.Furthermore, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system no other complaints of any kind for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.And at this time no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi: (b)(4).Associated medwatches [mr#1221934-2018-50497], [mr#1221934-2018-50498],[mr#1221934-2018-50499].
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RIGIDFIX FEM 3.3MM S/T XPIN
Type of Device
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key7450613
MDR Text Key106856162
Report Number1221934-2018-50496
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTY
UDI-Device Identifier10886705000890
UDI-Public10886705000890
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K974341
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Catalogue Number210133
Device Lot NumberL245184
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/04/2018
Date Manufacturer Received06/04/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-