BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS POWERGLIDE MIDLINE CATHETER, 18G 10CM; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned, at this time, to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.Device has not yet been returned for evaluation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the nurse placing the line noted that as he started to advance the catheter there was a slight tightness and then it stopped advancing.It was stated the nurse then started to pull the catheter back over the guidewire and it would not pull back, the patient complained of it hurting, so he pulled the entire line out.The guidewire was fully advanced into place.Once pulled out it was noted that the guidewire had pierced the catheter.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of complications during the insertion procedure is confirmed.The product implicated is a 5 fr powerpicc solo.The product returned is a 20 ga powerglide pro.The condition of the returned sample appears to match the event information provided.Use residue was observed throughout the device.The slider was returned fully advanced and the guidewire extended 34 mm from the distal end of the needle.The catheter wings and the catheter were partially advanced but still within the device housing.The distal end of the guidewire was extending from the catheter 1.5 mm.The catheter was observed to be punctured by the needle 34 mm from the distal end which is indicative of the catheter being retracted against the needle bevel.The catheter was advanced and removed successfully from the device with slight resistance that appeared to be caused by the dried residue.The damage observed on the device appeared to be cause by improper procedure; therefore the complaint of complications during the insertion procedure is confirmed.The ifu states, ¿warning: once the catheter has been advanced, do not re-insert the needle back into the catheter or pull the catheter back onto the needle.If the catheter needs to be repositioned, either do so without the aid of the needle, or remove both the catheter and the needle as a unit to prevent the needle from damaging or shearing the catheter¿ and ¿while holding the catheter wings in place, fully remove housing from the catheter.¿ a lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the nurse placing the line noted that as he started to advance the catheter there was a slight tightness and then it stopped advancing.It was stated the nurse then started to pull the catheter back over the guidewire and it would not pull back, the patient complained of it hurting, so he pulled the entire line out.The guidewire was fully advanced into place.Once pulled out it was noted that the guidewire had pierced the catheter.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|