Model Number QNR9161022 |
Device Problem
Extrusion (2934)
|
Patient Problem
Erosion (1750)
|
Event Date 03/15/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Once our evaluation is complete, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to the available information, erosion/extrusion.Pump exposure to scrotum.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Quality was unsuccessful in securing the explanted prosthesis for evaluation.Without the benefit of analyzing the explant, quality cannot confirm any observations and cannot comment on the condition of the prosthesis.If the explanted device becomes available, or additional information is received, quality will re-evaluate this complaint in accordance to procedures.However, because quality's examination may not conclusively confirm or disprove the report of erosion/extrusion, quality accepts the physician's observations of such as the reason for surgical intervention.Quality reviewed the manufacturing records for this device and confirmed that there were no discrepancies that would have contributed to this complaint and verified that the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.Management routinely reviews events such as this and monitors complaint levels.Additionally, events of this type are captured in the product risk documentation.Based on this information, and because the device is not available for evaluation, no further corrective action is required at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This follow-up mdr is created to document the evaluation of the returned device.A titan otr pump, two cylinders, and a reservoir were received for evaluation.Examination of the returned components revealed no abnormalities that would have contributed to the report of erosion.However, because quality's examination of the returned components may not conclusively confirm or disprove the report of erosion, quality accepts the physician's observations of such as the reason for surgical intervention.Quality reviewed the manufacturing records for this device and confirmed that there were no discrepancies that would have contributed to this complaint and verified that the devices from this lot met all specifications prior to release.A review of the complaint history database revealed no other complaints for lot 5258474.Review of nonconforming reports revealed no nonconformance's that relate to the reported complaint for this lot.No capas are associated with this lot.Management routinely reviews events such as this and monitors complaint levels.Additionally, events of this type are captured in the product risk documentation.Based on this information, no further corrective action is required at this time.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|