• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97725
Device Problems Bent (1059); Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); High impedance (1291); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099)
Event Date 04/24/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of medical devices: product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), product type lead.Information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 977a260, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 07-apr-2022, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the healthcare provider (hcp) regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator for an unknown indication for use.It was reported that the doctor had placed the lead and while attempting to test it the rep did an impedance check.Electrodes 0, 3, 7 showed high impedances while the others were in the 5 to 7 thousand range.It was reported that it repeatedly had an oor when they were trying to test it and the patient did not feel paraesthesia at any point no matter what electrodes, pulse width or hz was used.It was indicated that the physician did use air for their loss of resistance so they waited about 15 minutes to see if the issue would dissipate, but the impedances stayed the same.The doctor manipulated the lead and took it in and out of the wens.It was reported that the connections were good, but the impedances were worse.The doctor pulled the lead out and felt like maybe it had a small kink at the tip and mutually agreed to just try a new wire.After the new lead was placed, impedances were in the 1000 range and the patient felt paraesthesia.The issue was resolved at the time of the report.It was reported that there were no external factors that contributed to the issue.It was reported that the rep was wondering if a large amount of epidural fat was the cause of the high and intermittent impedances.The physician and the rep both thought it was a good idea to send the lead in to see if there were any issues with it.It was reported that no symptoms were reported.The lead was never implanted and would be returned for analysis.It was reported that the event occurred on (b)(6) 2018.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id: neu_stylet_acc, serial# unknown, product type: accessory; product id: 977a260, serial# (b)(4), product type: lead.Analysis of the lead found no issue.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7467015
MDR Text Key106713586
Report Number3007566237-2018-01262
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/26/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number97725
Device Catalogue Number97725
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/15/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age77 YR
-
-