• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO PROTACK; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO PROTACK; LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY Back to Search Results
Model Number 174006
Device Problems Failure To Adhere Or Bond (1031); Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/23/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic rectopexy, when the device was used to attach the mesh to the promontorium, the instrument handle felt stiff from the beginning.The two tacks came out with loud noise but then got stuck.The tacks were able to be fired normally from the device and penetrate the tissue however it did not hold correctly onto the tissue.They took another one which did the same.Then they changed the lot series and that instrument worked properly.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of six devices.Visual inspection of the first product noted the timing was disengaged and a tack was protruding.Additionally, the trigger was jammed.Functionally, the trigger of the instrument was actuated after disassembling the body from the tube.Tacks were jammed in the tube and did not deploy due to the timing disruption.The remaining five instruments were received sealed with no visual abnormalities.The triggers of all five instruments were actuated and all tacks deployed and seated properly in the test media.A review of the device history record indicates the product was released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.Replication of the reported condition is caused by an instrument that has been exposed to excessive force while applying helixes to a surface.If a helix is fired over improper surfaces it can provoke the exertion of excessive force to the handle causing the unit to disrupt the timing and to a possible jam.The root cause of the observed damage was misuse of the product which would have caused or contributed to the reported incident.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTACK
Type of Device
LAPAROSCOPE, GENERAL & PLASTIC SURGERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer (Section G)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer Contact
lisa hernandez
60 middletown ave
north haven, CT 06473
2034925563
MDR Report Key7476388
MDR Text Key107023768
Report Number2647580-2018-02219
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier10884521070400
UDI-Public10884521070400
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
PMA/PMN Number
K090470
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/01/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model Number174006
Device Catalogue Number174006
Device Lot NumberP8B1253PX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/03/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/18/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/22/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-