Title: anterior colporrhaphy versus repair with mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a comparative clinical study.The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of anterior colporrhaphy versus mesh repair as surgical management of anterior vaginal prolapse.A total of 44 patients underwent surgical repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse (cystocele) and were included in the study.Of which, 23 patients received anterior colporrhaphy (group 1) and 21 patients received soft gynemesh ps mesh (group 2).In group 2, the patients had mesh repair where the development of vesicovaginal space was done as before, followed by reflection of the vaginal wall laterally.Then a trapezoid piece of single-layered prolene mesh was fashioned to fit the defect from the urethrovesical junction anteriorly to the vaginal apex posteriorly.The mesh was anchored to the underlying connective tissue at the lateral limits of the previous dissection with interrupted tension free polyglactin sutures stitched to the mesh¿s four corners and mid-lateral edges.Mesh anchoring was checked by trying to mobilize it by atraumatic forceps.In group 2, reported complications included urinary infection (n-3) and mesh erosion (n-1).It was concluded that the use of polypropylene mesh for vaginal prolapse repair is superior to classical anterior repair in terms of anatomic and functional outcomes.The mesh repair is simple, relatively safe on a short-term basis, and appears to be an effective method of preventing recurrence with high success rate and low local morbidity.
|