• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS PPICC, IR, 135 CM; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS PPICC, IR, 135 CM; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3174335J
Device Problems Knotted (1340); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Date 04/18/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of reby1731 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after puncturing the needle and confirming the backflow of blood, the operator inserted the guidewire into the superior vena cava.After inserting the sheath, when the operator inserted the catheter, he felt resistance.Therefore he removed the catheter.He tried to re-insert the guidewire through the sheath, but he felt resistance.Then, he confirmed that the distal end part of the guidewire tied up to a knot and he could not remove the guidewire.He made an incision at the puncturing site and removed the guidewire successfully.The physician inferred that "while he was trying to remove the guidewire which had migrated out of the vessel, the guidewire got to be tied up.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the guidewire was tied in a knot was confirmed and it appeared that the guidewire was damaged during use.One 0.018¿ x 135cm guidewire was received in its hoop.The blue tip straightener was not returned with the hoop.What appeared to be blood residue was observed on the hoop.A knot was observed in the coiled segment of the guidewire 1.6cm from the distal weld tip.The coiled section of the guidewire was curled proximal to the knot.A microscopic examination revealed blood and use residue within the knotted section of the guidewire.A tactual investigation revealed that the weld tip was intact.Due to the evidence of use on the guidewire, it appeared that the wire inadvertently folded over itself and was twisted into a knot during the procedure.It was reported that the guidewire was inserted into the superior vena cava.Had the knot existed prior to use, the wire would not have fit through the needle.No manufacturing related defects were noted on the complaint sample.A review of the device history record (dhr) showed no deviations/issues associated with this problem in regards to product materials, manufacturing, or qc inspection processes.No further action is required because the complainant event could not be related to a deficiency in product manufacture or deficiency while under correct product use.A lot history review (lhr) of reby1731 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after puncturing the needle and confirming the backflow of blood, the operator inserted the guidewire into the superior vena cava.After inserting the sheath, when the operator inserted the catheter, he felt resistance.Therefore he removed the catheter.He tried to re-insert the guidewire through the sheath, but he felt resistance.Then, he confirmed that the distal end part of the guidewire tied up to a knot and he could not remove the guidewire.He made an incision at the puncturing site and removed the guidewire successfully.The physician inferred that "while he was trying to remove the guidewire which had migrated out of the vessel, the guidewire got to be tied up.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PPICC, IR, 135 CM
Type of Device
CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
tesha udy
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225819
MDR Report Key7500062
MDR Text Key107779780
Report Number3006260740-2018-00940
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741111716
UDI-Public(01)00801741111716
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K070996
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/28/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number3174335J
Device Lot NumberREBY1731
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/31/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received06/05/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age97 YR
-
-