Catalog Number B1080-040 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Rupture (1546)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/13/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified and occluded lesion located in the right iliac artery.The armada 35 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty catheter was advanced to the lesion but the balloon ruptured during the second inflation at nominal pressure.During removal, the device met resistance with the guide wire and both were removed as a single unit.When the balloon was inspected, it was observed that the balloon separated and a marker was missing.It is assumed the separated piece of balloon and marker that separated remained in the sheath, as there was no evidence that anything was left in patient.The procedure was aborted with no further treatment.There was no reported adverse patient effect.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture and separation were confirmed.The difficulty removing was not tested due to the condition of the device.It was reported that the lesion site was heavily calcified and occluded which likely contributed to the rupture.The difficulty removing and separation likely occurred due to the ruptured balloon material catching on the sheath during removal.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties were due to case circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents from this lot.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|