• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX INC. VITEK®2 AST-P634 TEST KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX INC. VITEK®2 AST-P634 TEST KIT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 415671
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem Misdiagnosis (2159)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
A customer from the (b)(6) reported a false susceptible result for a (b)(6) strain associated with vitek®2 ast-p634 test kit 20 cards (lot 7340502403).The customer stated that during the initial testing of the impacted strain from a patient isolate (wound swab: abscess) using cos media from oxoid, they obtained results consistent with a (b)(6) strain.The strain was sent to the (b)(6) reference laboratory for pvl testing, and the result was (b)(6).After discussion with the reference laboratory it was discovered that on their initial vitek®2 testing the isolate appeared to be a (b)(6) strain but after a (b)(6) pcr test for meca gene and further testing (oxacillin mic value=(b)(6) ; cefoxitin mic value = 64 mg/l) the reference laboratory reported (b)(6).Repeat swabs from the same patient were requested two months later, and were cultured on (b)(6) media and routine columbia blood agar from oxoid.The s.Aureus strain isolated from the (b)(6) media when tested on vitek indicated (b)(6).The strain isolated from blood agar plate was tested on vitek and indicated a conflict between cefoxitin and oxacillin.A cefoxitin etest ® was performed with the result of (b)(6).This isolate when tested at the (b)(6) reference lab again and was found to be a (b)(6).The (b)(6) reference laboratory also performed etest for cefoxitin (b)(6) and oxacillin (b)(6).The customer stated that patient results were affected and wrong results reported to the physician that led to an inappropriate treatment by flucloxacillin and that there was a delay in reporting results.The customer stated that at the moment of the first test, the patient was maybe under flucloxacillin treatment , and it was not known if the swab was taken before antibiotic treatment started.The isolate was possibly subjected to various antibiotic treatments prior to vitek®2 testing that could have affected its growth and test results.Biomérieux recommended that the customer repeat testing using columbia agar without antibiotic addition.A biomérieux internal investigation will be initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation was initiated due to a customer reporting a discrepant cefoxitin screen test (oxsf) and a discrepant susceptible oxacillin (ox) result for a staphylococcus aureus patient isolate associated with vitek® 2 v7.01 software, ast-p634 card.The presence of an (b)(6) strain was confirmed by pcr meca positive and clonal complex cc5-(b)(6)-iv (pediatric clone).The reference method (agar dilution) for oxacillin (ox) gave resistant (r) results (ox mic = 4 mg/l r).The disc diffusion for cefoxitin (fox) gave : d=16 mm r.Tests performed on vitek 2 v7.01, ast-p634 card (aes parameters : global european based + phenotypic) : three ast-p634 cards (one from customer lot # 7340423203 (cl1), one from customer lot # 7340502403 (cl2) and one from a random lot # 7340690403 (rl)) were tested from cos subculture.Note: coh and brillance (b)(6) media are not recommended by biomerieux to test vt2 cards.- cl and rl: ox mic = 0.5 mg/l s, oxsf negative test with "acquired penicillinase" phenotype.- the vitek 2 ox values are discrepant compared to the reference mic.- the negative oxsf tests are not correlated with the disc diffusion result (fox kb r).Conclusion: * on vitek 2 system version 7.0, false susceptible oxacillin and negative oxsf results were reproduced internally, which lead to the non-detection of the mrsa isolate due to late growth in oxsf well.* the new software version 8.01 improves the detection of the (b)(6) phenotype since oxsf test is obtained (b)(6), and aes system gave "modification of pbp" phenotype (oxsf knowledge base was modified in this new version).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITEK®2 AST-P634 TEST KIT
Type of Device
VITEK®2 AST-P634 TEST KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX INC.
595 anglum road
st. louis MO 63042
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX INC.
595 anglum road
st. louis MO 63042
Manufacturer Contact
debra broyles
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
3147317301
MDR Report Key7537139
MDR Text Key109044519
Report Number1950204-2018-00197
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LON
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K053097
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/06/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/23/2019
Device Catalogue Number415671
Device Lot Number7340423203
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/10/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-