Catalog Number 393204 |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Hole In Material (1293)
|
Patient Problem
Hematoma (1884)
|
Event Date 05/15/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported with the use of the bd venflon pro¿ (bd¿ vialon biomaterial) there was an issue with leakage.It was stated ¿the patient had a hematoma.When the device was removed the consumer saw that the needle was through the catheter.There was also leakage of infusion liquid from the hole.Device had to be replaced.¿ there was no report of injury or further medical intervention.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported with the use of the bd venflon pro¿ (bd¿ vialon biomaterial) there was an issue with leakage.It was stated ¿the patient had a hematoma.When the device was removed the consumer saw that the needle was through the catheter.There was also leakage of infusion liquid from the hole.Device had to be replaced.¿ there was no report of injury or further medical intervention.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation summary: the returned unit was inspected and the reported observation of needle through catheter which caused the reported leakage was confirmed.However, the source of the defect could not be determined.A device history record review showed no non-conformance's associated with this issue during the production of this batch.This reported nonconformance could have occurred out of the manufacturing facilities.There is an automated vision inspection system that rejects parts with this type of defect.Investigation conclusion: the returned sample is different from the catalog reported for this complaint.The root cause will be based on the sample received.There is an automated vision inspection system that rejects part not meeting lie distance requirement.A needle pierce though catheter defect will automatically be rejected as the lie distance will be out of specification.There is no process in the manufacturing facilities that could have caused this nonconformance.Therefore, this reported nonconformance could have occurred out of the manufacturing facilities.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|