STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRI TS FEMUR SZ6 LEFT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 5512-F-601 |
Device Problem
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problems
Injury (2348); Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
Event Date 12/20/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been two other events for the reported lot.Both relate to the same patient.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient's left knee dislocated and was treated with closed reduction under anesthesia (b)(6) 2017.Per exam notes: "[patient] states that he was in his recliner again when his knee popped out of place again this morning.He has not been in his knee immobilizer since approximately one week ago".Operative report indicates ".Who had a dislocation approximately 2 weeks ago [event reported for (b)(6) 2017] that was closed reduced.He wore a knee immobilizer for a week, and then today, he was sitting in his chair with his leg in an awkward position, flexed it, and it dislocated again.".Subsequent imaging reported "both ap and lateral planes revealed acceptable reduction of the knee replacement".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding dislocation involving a triathlon femoral component was reported.The event was confirmed.Confirmed: through review of the provided medical records and x-rays by a clinical consultant.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the provided medical records and/or x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: no examination of any explanted components except for the insert from the (b)(6) 2018 revision surgery and no primary left total knee arthroplasty operative report or list of components are available for review.The medial position of the revision tibial component and the distal position of the joint line in the revision total knee arthroplasty likely resulted in increased stress to the ts insert stability resulting in two dislocations and a later anterior implant subluxation.There is no evidence that factors of implant design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation."the medial position of the revision tibial component and the distal position of the joint line in the revision total knee arthroplasty likely resulted in increased stress to the ts insert stability resulting in two dislocations and a later anterior implant subluxation." the consulting clinician clarified that this conclusion reflects an alignment issue of the tibial baseplate and femoral component leading toward subsequent subluxation and dislocation.Device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been two other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: clinician review of the medical records provided indicated "the medial position of the revision tibial component and the distal position of the joint line in the revision total knee arthroplasty likely resulted in increased stress to the ts insert stability resulting in two dislocations and a later anterior implant subluxation.There is no evidence that factors of implant design, manufacturing or materials were responsible for this clinical situation.The consulting clinician clarified that this conclusion reflects an alignment issue of the tibial baseplate and femoral component leading toward subsequent subluxation and dislocation." no further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient's left knee dislocated and was treated with closed reduction under anesthesia (b)(6) 2017.Per exam notes: "[patient] states that he was in his recliner again when his knee popped out of place again this morning.He has not been in his knee immobilizer since approximately one week ago".Operative report indicates ".Who had a dislocation approximately 2 weeks ago [event reported for (b)(6) 2017] that was closed reduced.He wore a knee immobilizer for a week, and then today, he was sitting in his chair with his leg in an awkward position, flexed it, and it dislocated again.".Subsequent imaging reported "both ap and lateral planes revealed acceptable reduction of the knee replacement"."the medial position of the revision tibial component and the distal position of the joint line in the revision total knee arthroplasty likely resulted in increased stress to the ts insert stability resulting in two dislocations and a later anterior implant subluxation." the consulting clinician clarified that this conclusion reflects an alignment issue of the tibial baseplate and femoral component leading toward subsequent subluxation and dislocation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|