|
Catalog Number 0118241 |
Device Problem
Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problems
Erosion (1750); Pain (1994); Abnormal Vaginal Discharge (2123)
|
Event Date 06/24/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There is no connection that can be made at this time between the reported unspecified post-operative complications and any problem with the bard/davol dulex device used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did not allege a specific device failure or patient adverse event, and no medical records have been provided.Based on the limited information provided at this time, no conclusions can be made.A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: the information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following was alleged by the patient's attorney and medical records: on (b)(6) 2007: the patient was diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence, vaginal relaxation, abnormal bleeding, right adnexal mass and underwent a two part procedure which included total abd hysterectomy, bilat salpingo-oophorectomy, an abd sacrocolpopexy with implant of a bard/davol dulex mesh to reduce enterocele and implant of a tension-free vaginal tape using a non bard/davol "gynecare tvt" mesh sling.On (b)(6) 2009: the patient was diagnosed with erosion of vaginal mesh and underwent a partial excision of the vaginal mesh and closure of the vagina.Per operative dictation "2cm area a granulation tissue was noted at the apex of the vagina and was trimmed away.It was noted at that time, there was a 1cm area of "suspension mesh" that was present in the center of this area that had to granulation tissue in it.The mesh (dulex) was grasped, all of which appeared to be retroperitoneal and excised in several small pieces.All visible mesh was removed".The patient is reported to have had persistent vaginal pain and drainage.On (b)(6) 2015: the patient was diagnosed with eroded mesh into vagina and underwent a robotic-assisted laparoscopic removal of the sacrocolpopexy mesh (dulex) followed by vaginaoscopy.Per operative dictation "mesh (dulex) released in its entirety as 1 piece.".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|