H.6.Investigation summary: device/batch history record review: the lot number was built on afa line 9 and packaged on packaging line 11 from april 8, 2017 thru april 13, 2017.Per review of the dhr it was concluded that all required challenges, samples, and testing were performed per specifications in accordance with the in-process sampling plans.Per review it was noted that there were no reject activity findings throughout the build of this lot that would impact upon the quality of the product.Qn / sap database review: yes.Reason: dhr was reviewed.Findings: 1 non related qn (b)(4)-damaged luer adapter was initiated and disposition of the product, root cause and corrective action(s) were applied according to the quality control plan.Visual analysis: observations and testing: received 1 insyte autoguard bc 18ga units from lot number 7089532 exp.2020-03-31.Visual/microscopic examination: the package received was partially open at one end.Note: the product characteristics require a minimum of 1/8¿ seal width with adhesive transfer from the top web paper to the bottom web film.This characteristic was met.In addition the paper top web of the returned units was analyzed under uv light.The adhesive used to seal the top and bottom webs is uv fluorescent.The analysis revealed adequate top web adhesive.The key variables that affect seal strength are seal transfer/width and top web adhesive presence.Both of these variables were included in the investigation.Test description: method no.: results: visual/microscopic.N/a.See observations and testing.Investigation samples(s) meet manufacturing specifications: yes; although the defect was confirmed, the unit evaluated for this incident was acceptable per the manufacturing specification requirements of the package.Investigation conclusion: relationship of device to the reported incident: indeterminate comment: although the packages were observed to be partially opened, there was no physical evidence to confirm or to support manufacturing process related issues for the defect.
|