Model Number E110 |
Device Problems
Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
|
Event Date 04/11/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is being evaluated in our post market quality assurance laboratory.This product issue will be updated when evaluation is complete.
|
|
Event Description
|
Boston scientific received information that this device was explanted due to the patient receiving a heart transplant.The device was programmed to electrocautery protection mode prior to surgery.A magnet was applied due to some issues during the procedure.A health care provider reported that device interrogation following the surgery revealed the device was no longer programmed to electrocautery protection mode.The caller inquired if magnet application could have caused the programming change.A boston scientific technical services consultant stated this would not occur as a result of magnet application and the programming must have been cancelled.A boston scientific sales representative was called to the facility and was informed that device interrogation was now unsuccessful despite the use of two programmers and three wands.Additionally, the device was hot to the touch.The representative confirmed interrogation was unsuccessful and stated the device was warm.The representative also noted that the device did not respond to magnet application.The device has been returned for testing.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our quality assurance laboratory.It was confirmed the device could not be telemetered.A visual examination identified a small arc mark on the exterior of the device case (image).This mark is indicative of external energy directly applied to the device case.The device case was removed to facilitate inspection and testing of the internal components.A small witness mark on the inside of the device case corresponding to the arc mark on the exterior of the case was identified.The battery voltage was measured at 0 volts.The battery was removed and replaced with an external power source.Testing revealed a high current draw.Photon emission microscopy was performed which identified a damaged area of the mixed mode integrated circuit (mmic) as the source of the high current draw.Analysis concluded this device was damaged due to exposure to external energy strong enough to damage the exterior of the device case as well as the internal circuitry of the device.This likely induced a reset which is why the device was no longer operating in electrocautery protection mode.The damage to the mmic resulted in a high current draw that rapidly depleted the battery causing the observed warming of the device and inability to interrogate it.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|