• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - JUGULAR; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - JUGULAR; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RF320J
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Extrusion (2934); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Great Vessel Perforation (2152)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for migration and perforation as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that the patient was injured when the filter migrated and perforated.The status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history record (dhr) could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images were not provided.Medical record was provided and reviewed.Approximately, ten years post filter deployment, ct revealed one of the posterior tines of the ivc filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.This was unchanged across multiple prior studies.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for filter migration and perforation of the ivc.Based on the provided medical records, there is no clear evidence to confirm for perforation of the ivc as it reported that one of posterior tines of the filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that patient injured when the filter migrated and perforated.The status of the patient is unknown.New information: it was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that filter migrated and perforated.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that patient injured when the filter migrated and perforated.The status of the patient is unknown.New information: it was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that filter migrated and perforated.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history record (dhr) could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images were not provided.Medical record was provided and reviewed.Approximately, ten years post filter deployment, ct revealed one of the posterior tines of the ivc filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.This was unchanged across multiple prior studies.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for filter migration and perforation of the ivc.Based on the provided medical records, there is no clear evidence to confirm for perforation of the ivc as it reported that one of posterior tines of the filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
G2 FILTER SYSTEM - JUGULAR
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
MDR Report Key7635330
MDR Text Key112234549
Report Number2020394-2018-00965
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K052578
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/25/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRF320J
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/03/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
LOVENOX, COUMADIN; LOVENOX, COUMADIN
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Weight61
-
-