|
Catalog Number RF320J |
Device Problems
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Extrusion (2934); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Abdominal Pain (1685); Great Vessel Perforation (2152)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for migration and perforation as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that the patient was injured when the filter migrated and perforated.The status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history record (dhr) could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images were not provided.Medical record was provided and reviewed.Approximately, ten years post filter deployment, ct revealed one of the posterior tines of the ivc filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.This was unchanged across multiple prior studies.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for filter migration and perforation of the ivc.Based on the provided medical records, there is no clear evidence to confirm for perforation of the ivc as it reported that one of posterior tines of the filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that patient injured when the filter migrated and perforated.The status of the patient is unknown.New information: it was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that filter migrated and perforated.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that patient injured when the filter migrated and perforated.The status of the patient is unknown.New information: it was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that filter migrated and perforated.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history record (dhr) could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images were not provided.Medical record was provided and reviewed.Approximately, ten years post filter deployment, ct revealed one of the posterior tines of the ivc filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.This was unchanged across multiple prior studies.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for filter migration and perforation of the ivc.Based on the provided medical records, there is no clear evidence to confirm for perforation of the ivc as it reported that one of posterior tines of the filter appeared to have created a channel within the anterior/inferior aspect of the l4 vertebral body.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|