• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL UNK T2 TIBIAL PROXIMAL SCREW; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL UNK T2 TIBIAL PROXIMAL SCREW; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_KIE
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 11/01/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.Device not available to stryker.
 
Event Description
The manufacturer became aware of a post market clinical follow-up (pmcf) from (b)(6).The title of this report is ¿a post-market clinical follow-up (pmcf) of the treatment of tibial fractures with the t2 tibial nailing system¿ which was published in june 2018 and is associated with the t2 tibial nailing system.Within that publication, postoperative complications/ adverse events were reported, which occurred between november 2012 to september 2017.It was not possible to ascertain specific device or patient information from the article, a review of the complaint handling database, however, revealed that the events have not been reported by the hospital or by the author of the publication, therefore 66 complaints were initiated retrospectively for different adverse events mentioned in the journal.This product inquiry addresses screw backout.Two out of 2 cases.The pmcfr states: ¿subject was a (b)(6) caucasian female, with a left closed tibia fracture after being a pedestrian struck while crossing the street.Health history was significant for osteopenia.No other concurrent injuries or orthopaedic injuries.Subject went to the operating room and had a t2 tibia nail with proximal screws in the transverse (medial to lateral and lateral to medial) and oblique modes with 2 distal screws in 1 plane.Subject was discharged on pod #2 to acute rehabilitation, toe-touch weightbearing.At a follow-up visit, pod #50, subject had the distal of the proximal screws, the transverse one, seems to have baked out.Recommended to monitor.At the 3 month follow-up visit, the screw back-out was noted to be stable and did not back out any further.At the 13 month follow-up, subject went on to have bone consolidation and 2 proximal screws were prominent but not tenting or causing subject any complaints.Subject was discharged from follow-up.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK T2 TIBIAL PROXIMAL SCREW
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
Manufacturer Contact
melissa guattery
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key7704133
MDR Text Key114548873
Report Number0009610622-2018-00334
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/19/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/19/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_KIE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
-
-