Model Number 304-20 |
Device Problem
Device Contamination with Body Fluid (2317)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 07/18/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a patient¿s prophylactic generator replacement, the lead wires were found to be exposed after the chest site was opened.All pre-surgical diagnostics and diagnostics at the neurologist follow up two weeks prior showed normal impedance readings.The lead and generator were replaced.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.The explanted devices have not been received by the manufacturer to-date.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Event description, corrected data: information was inadvertently provided incorrectly in the initial report.Device evaluated by mfr, corrected data: the device evaluation field was inadvertently marked incorrectly on the initial report.Evaluation codes, corrected data: a conclusion code was inadvertently not provided on the initial report.
|
|
Event Description
|
The reason for replacement was provided to be prophylactic for the generator and due to a discontinuity with the lead.The explanted devices were received.Analysis is underway, but has not been completed to-date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Analysis was completed for the returned generator.The pulse generator diagnostics were as expected for the programmed parameters.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.Electrical evaluation showed that the generator performed according to functional specifications.The battery measured 2.829 volts and was not in a depleted condition.The downloaded data revealed that 77.136% of the battery had been consumed.There were no performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.Analysis was completed for the returned lead.The reported lead break was not verified within the returned lead portions.Fluid leaks were verified.Abraded openings were noted on the outer silicone tubing at multiple locations.Note that since the electrode array portion was not returned for analysis, an evaluation and resulting commentary cannot be made on that portion of the lead.Other than the above mentioned observations and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned lead portions.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|