Model Number 7427 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Abscess (1690); Purulent Discharge (1812); Foreign Body Reaction (1868); Pain (1994); Irritability (2421)
|
Event Date 01/01/2003 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant medical products: product id: 7495-25, lot/serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2002, product type: extension.Product id: 7495lz25, lot/serial#: (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2002, product type: extension.Product id: 3487a, lot/serial#: (b)(4), product type: lead.Product id: 3487a, lot#serial#: (b)(4), product type: lead.Analysis results were not available at the time of this report.A follow up report will be sent once analysis is complete.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for failed back surgery syndrome.The patient reported that her body rejected the device.The patient had a bad abscess.The patient reported that the device was implanted in her cheek of buttocks.The patient reported that it was irritated where it was because it kept getting hit.The patient reported that she used lidocaine but she couldn't bear the pain anymore.The patient reported that the ins was removed because the skin busted open and it was draining puss.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Analysis of the ins (b)(4) found no significant anomalies.Product analysis #(b)(4).The implantable neurostimulator (ins) passed functional testing.Analysis determined there were no issues when pressing on the ins can.Analysis determined the telemetry was acceptable.The ins output was tested through the returned extension and lead.Good stable output was observed on all electrode pairs the ins had when it was received.The ins output was tested through the returned extension and lead.Good stable output was observed on all electrode pairs.The ins output was tested through the returned extension and cut lead.Good stable output was observed on all electrode pairs the ins had when it was received.The ins output was tested through the returned extension and cut lead.Good stable output was observed on all electrode pairs.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Continuation: product id 7495-25 (b)(4) implanted: (b)(6)2002 product type extension product id 7495lz25 (b)(4) implanted: (b)(6)2002 product type extension product id 3487a lot# j0211651v product type lead product id 3487a lot# j0211651v product type lead all previously reported codes are still applicable.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for failed back surgery syndrome.The patient reported that her body rejected the device.The patient had a bad abscess.The patient reported that the device was implanted in her cheek of buttocks.The patient reported that it was irritated where it was because it kept getting hit.The patient reported that she used lidocaine but she couldn¿t bear the pain anymore.The patient reported that the ins was removed because the skin busted open and it was draining puss.No further complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a consumer.The patient stated that the reason their device abscessed was likely not due to the device, but rather the device location.The device was implanted in their butt, so whenever they sat, moved, bumped it the device was irritated.No further complications were reported or anticipated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|