The reason for this revision surgery was due to bone loss and possible infection.The length of in-vivo service could not be determined since the date of the original surgery is unknown.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was a significant adverse event to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history record (dhr) was not conducted since the part and lot number were not provided or determined during the complaint evaluation.No additional information was obtained to assist in the event identification.Given the limited information, an extensive search for an invoice, of the previous surgery, produced no results.Without this information, this investigation is limited in scope.If additional information can be provided at a later time and produces a search with positive results, this investigation will be updated.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to bone loss and possible infection.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an infection that are outside of the control of djo surgical.With the limited information provided about the patient and the devices removed during the revision surgery, it is impossible to determine the source of the infection.Containment based on the information submitted with this complaint it is not possible as the agent was unable to supply the part and lot number.
|