• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN 980 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN 980 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 980
Device Problem Defective Alarm (1014)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: the service engineer reported that there was no voltage measured to the bd piezo alarm during testing.The device has not been repaired.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that, during preventative maintenance, a 980 ventilator failed the breath delivery (bd) audio test on an extended self test (est).The ventilator was not in use on a patient at the time of the reported event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h2 evaluation code result.Device evaluation summary: the service engineer (se) inspected the device and replaced the breath delivery (bd) power distribution/power controller printed circuit board (pcb).The se found the device generating a serial number mismatch.The se replaced the line interface pcb and the communications backplane pcb.The ventilator passed all testing per manufacturing specification and was placed back into clinical use.If the replaced parts are returned for failure investigation, a supplement medwatch report with the findings will be submitted once the investigation is complete.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: the following components were returned for failure investigation.1.Breath deliver (bd) power controller/ bd power distribution printed circuit board (pcb) 2.Line interface pcb 3.Communications backplane pcb all parts were visually inspected with no visible distortion or damage observed that may have affected the function of the board.The communications backplane pcb and the line interface pcb were functionally tested with no anomalies observed.There was no fault found.The bd power controller and the bd power distribution pcbs were functionally tested.The reported event that ventilator failed the bd audio portion of the extended self test was duplicated.Based on the failure of the piezo alarm to charge, the probable cause of the reported failure is a faulty c4 capacitor on the power controller pcba.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
980 VENTILATOR
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
michael collins road mervue
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
michael collins road mervue
galway
Manufacturer Contact
kelly adams
2101 faraday ave.
carlsbad, CA 92008
7606035046
MDR Report Key7850642
MDR Text Key119492386
Report Number8020893-2018-00430
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier10884521171541
UDI-Public10884521171541
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K162738
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/06/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number980
Device Catalogue Number980X1ENDIUU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/28/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-