This report is filed for retroperitoneal bleeding post procedure.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure treating mitral regurgitation (mr) grade 4.The steerable guide catheter (sgc) was advanced and resistance was possibly met.The device was used without further issue and three mitraclips were implanted, reducing the mr to grade 1.The femoral vein was closed as per standard procedure protocol with an arteriotomy closure device.Post-procedure, a retroperitoneal bleed (rpb) was noted from the iliac vein.Per physician, the rpb was possibly due to the steerable guide catheter.A vascular surgeon first attempted to treat the bleeding with a balloon and then performed vascular surgical repair.The event resolved and the patient has been discharged.No additional information was provided regarding this issue.
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents reported from this lot.It should be noted that the reported patient effects of vessel perforation and hemorrhage, as listed in the mitraclip system instructions for use (ifu) is a known possible complication associated with mitraclip procedures.All available information was investigated and the reported physical resistance during steerable guide catheter (sgc)advancement appears to be due to the procedural conditions/user technique.Additionally, the reported perforation appears to be the cascading/procedural condition of physical resistance with anatomy.However, the reported hemorrhage appears to be the secondary effect of the reported perforation.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|