(b)(4).This report is associated with product compliant: pending.This solicited case, reported by a consumer via a patient support program (psp), concerned a (b)(6) male patient of (b)(6) nationality.Medical history included constipation, high urine protein and mother and brother had diabetes.Concomitant medication included metformin taking since 1998 for type 2 diabetes mellitus.The patient received insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% (rdna origin) injections (humalog 50, 100 u/ml) via a cartridge with reusable device humapen ergo ii (started in (b)(6) 2018), twice daily, 28 iu units in morning and 18 iu in evening, subcutaneously, for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2, started therapy in (b)(6) 2018.Since an unknown date after starting insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% he had experiencing unstable blood sugar (values were not provided).In (b)(6) 2018, the dosage of insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% was adjusted to 30 units in the morning and 22 units in the evening according to the doctor advice.Because of unstable blood sugar, he was hospitalized twice in (b)(6) 2018 and (b)(6) 2018, respectively.In the beginning of (b)(6) 2018, the dose of insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% was adjusted to 26 units in the morning and 18 units in the morning according to the doctor advice.He had been discharged from hospital.Corrective treatment and outcome of the event was not provided.Therapy with insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% was ongoing.The user of the humapen ergo ii was unknown and his/ her training status was not provided.The humapen ergo ii general device durations of use and the suspect humapen ergo ii device durations of use were not reported.The suspect humapen ergo ii was continued and its return was not possible.The reporting consumer did not relate the event with insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% therapy did not provide relatedness with humapen ergo ii.
|