• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY HUMAPEN ERGO II; FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY HUMAPEN ERGO II; FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES Back to Search Results
Model Number MS9557
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no reported complaint for this device and its return is not expected.This is an initial report.A follow-up report will be submitted when the final evaluation is completed.
 
Event Description
(b)(4).This report is associated with product compliant: pending.This solicited case, reported by a consumer via a patient support program (psp), concerned a (b)(6) male patient of (b)(6) nationality.Medical history included constipation, high urine protein and mother and brother had diabetes.Concomitant medication included metformin taking since 1998 for type 2 diabetes mellitus.The patient received insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% (rdna origin) injections (humalog 50, 100 u/ml) via a cartridge with reusable device humapen ergo ii (started in (b)(6) 2018), twice daily, 28 iu units in morning and 18 iu in evening, subcutaneously, for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2, started therapy in (b)(6) 2018.Since an unknown date after starting insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% he had experiencing unstable blood sugar (values were not provided).In (b)(6) 2018, the dosage of insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% was adjusted to 30 units in the morning and 22 units in the evening according to the doctor advice.Because of unstable blood sugar, he was hospitalized twice in (b)(6) 2018 and (b)(6) 2018, respectively.In the beginning of (b)(6) 2018, the dose of insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% was adjusted to 26 units in the morning and 18 units in the morning according to the doctor advice.He had been discharged from hospital.Corrective treatment and outcome of the event was not provided.Therapy with insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% was ongoing.The user of the humapen ergo ii was unknown and his/ her training status was not provided.The humapen ergo ii general device durations of use and the suspect humapen ergo ii device durations of use were not reported.The suspect humapen ergo ii was continued and its return was not possible.The reporting consumer did not relate the event with insulin lispro protamine suspension 50%/insulin lispro 50% therapy did not provide relatedness with humapen ergo ii.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HUMAPEN ERGO II
Type of Device
FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
lilly corporate center
indianapolis IN 46285
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILLIPS-MEDISIZE CORPORATION
415 red cedar street
medical device manufacturing
menomonie WI 54751
Manufacturer Contact
chris davis
lilly corporate center
indianapolis, IN 46285
3174334585
MDR Report Key7899216
MDR Text Key121437914
Report Number1819470-2018-00163
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K151686
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/21/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/21/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberMS9557
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/28/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight85
-
-