• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37800
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930); Muscle Spasm(s) (1966); Pain (1994); Sepsis (2067); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Electric Shock (2554); Weight Changes (2607)
Event Date 06/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a consumer (con) regarding a patient who was implanted with a neurostimulator for gastric stimulation.It was reported that the patient had complications and infections.No device issues or further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information from the consumer on (b)(6) reported complications, uncontrollable pain, and infections and she had already talked to her healthcare professional (hcp).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient code c26726 no longer applies.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information from the consumer regarding the patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) on (b)(6) reported the gastric device was causing her sepsis and complications.It was noted the patient was transferred to patient services.The patient stated she had notified the hcp and per the patient the hcp checked the stimulator and said the stimulator was working fine and couldn¿t explain her abdominal pain and abdominal spasms.The patient noted the spasms and pain occurred daily.The patient noted the spasms and abdominal pain began the day of implant on (b)(6), 2018.The patient stated 2 weeks post implant the patient started experiencing shocking when she would eat and as a result the patient lost (b)(6) lbs, and the patient stated she was around (b)(6) lbs at the time of implant.The patient notified the hcp and the hcp reported it was abnormal.The patient noted she sent a video of the shocking of the abdomen to her hcp.The patient stated the hcp turned down the stimulation, however, they would not turn stimulation off.The patient noted she was referred to a malabsorption specialist.The patient stated the shocking wasn¿t as bad when stimulation was turned down.The patient discussed the situation with their parents and due to the distance to the specialist, they decided to work with a gastrointestinal hcp who was very experienced with gastroparesis and nutritionist and they developed a plan for her.The patient was hospitalized and give total parental nutrition.The patient stated the feeding port was removed and it was determined that was not the source of infection and the patient said that the only other implant they had was the gastric system.The patient noted the infection was confirmed and there was sepsis, gastrointestinal, bacteria.The patient noted the infection began in the middle of august and they went to the emergency room (er) and was diagnosed with sepsis.The patient was given 2 oral antibiotics.The patient was concerned the gastric stimulation system could be the source of infection and would like the system explanted.Additional information from the patient on (b)(6)reported they called the hcp and the hcp stated after looking over all the patient¿s medical record the hcp said they would not absolutely not removed the enterra device.The patient noted an hcp believed the device was the source of the infection because it was a gastrointestinal bacteria infection.The patient stated the sepsis would not clear up until the patient¿s device was removed.There were no further complications that have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from a healthcare professional (hcp).It was reported that no infection was noted on the patient¿s last visit on (b)(6) 2018.The patient had not followed-up since then.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7918835
MDR Text Key122043305
Report Number3004209178-2018-21793
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
UDI-Device Identifier00643169614246
UDI-Public00643169614246
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/18/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/28/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/28/2019
Device Model Number37800
Device Catalogue Number37800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/2018
Date Device Manufactured03/13/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age27 YR
Patient Weight34
-
-