• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN 980 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN 980 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number 980
Device Problem Defective Alarm (1014)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The field service engineer (fse) evaluated the device and replaced the breath delivery (bd) power control / distribution board.The ventilator passed all testing per manufacturing specification and was placed back into clinical use.If the replaced part is returned for failure investigation, a supplement medwatch report with the findings will be submitted once the investigation is complete.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a 980 ventilator failed the breath delivery unit (bdu) alarm test of the extended self test (est).The alarm did not sound.The ventilator was not in use on a patient at the time of the reported event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: the breath delivery (bd) power board / distribution board was returned for failure investigation.Both parts were visually inspected with no anomalies observed.The bd power distribution board was functionally tested with no malfunction or product deficiency identified.The bd power controller was installed into a test ventilator for analysis.The ventilator powered on with no errors, alerts, alarms, or other issues.Calibration was successfully completed.The extended self test (est) bd audio test was run 10 times, with the following results: - the first attempt failed with error message "power - fail cap not discharging" generating no sound and no prompt to confirm the presence of the alarm.- the next 9 attempts failed with "piezo alarm failure" generating no sound and a prompt to confirm the present of the alarm.A complete est was then run, passing all tests except the bd audio, which generated the same failures as the initial attempts.Sst (short self-test) was locked out due to the failure during est.The reported event that ventilator failed the bd audio portion of est was duplicated.The probable cause of the reported failure is a faulty c4 capacitor on the power controller pcba.Despite the ¿piezo alarm failure¿ error codes, the piezo alarm was confirmed to be functioning both before and after testing the returned boards.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
980 VENTILATOR
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
micheal collins rd mervue
galway
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
micheal collins rd mervue
galway
Manufacturer Contact
kelly adams
15 hampshire street
carlsbad, CA 92008
7606035046
MDR Report Key7927404
MDR Text Key122458723
Report Number8020893-2018-00486
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
UDI-Device Identifier10884521172524
UDI-Public10884521172524
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K162738
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/02/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number980
Device Catalogue Number980X3ENDIUU
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/18/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/16/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-