• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK ENDOSCOPY MEMORY II DOUBLE LUMEN EXTRACTION BASKET; FFL, DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET, URETHRAL, METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK ENDOSCOPY MEMORY II DOUBLE LUMEN EXTRACTION BASKET; FFL, DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET, URETHRAL, METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G25149
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/07/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved determined that the drive wire was separated from the cable.The basket would not move when the handle was manipulated.The device was returned with the basket fully retracted and clear fluid present in the lumen.Although the handle could move during functional testing, the basket does not advance/retract with handle movement.There was a grinding sound/feeling with handle manipulation.The handle was disassembled and it was noted that the drive wire was separated from the cable.Nesting was noted inside the purple hub.The portion of drive wire cable remaining attached to the handle cannula had nested (bunched up against the handle cannula).For further evaluation of the drive wire cable and basket, the catheter was cut to push the drive wire cable out of the sheath.The basket is fully formed with a wire dislodged from the distal metal tip.The drive wire cable from inside the sheath has nested.Solder is present on the handle cannula and drive wire cable at the joint.No other anomalies were detected with the device.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.Basket advancement/retraction difficulties and nesting of the drive wire can occur if the device experiences excessive pressure.Resistance in basket movement and bends in the catheter can occur if the elevator of the endoscope is used to deflect the device at a sharp angle.The instructions for use indicate: "advance device through channel, in short increments, until basket sheath exits endoscope." the instructions for use state: "confirm desired position of basket sheath relative to target.Advance basket out of sheath.Caution: pulling on sheath while advancing or retracting basket may damage device, rendering it inoperable." prior to distribution, all memory ii double lumen extraction baskets are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment corrective action: corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
 
Event Description
During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp), the physician used a cook memory ii double lumen extraction basket.The basket was retracted into the sheath after the physician removed the device from the packaging pouch prior to use.(he only retracted the basket into the sheath and did not verify the basket extension and retraction during preparation).The patient's anatomy was not tortuous, so the endoscope was positioned with no difficulty.The device was advanced through the bile duct, then the user attempted to open the basket.However, because the basket would not open, another mb-35-2x4-8 was used instead to complete the procedure.There have been no adverse effects to the patient reported.There was no reportable information at this time.The device was evaluated on 17-sep-2018 and it was determined that the drive cable was disconnected from the drive wire.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEMORY II DOUBLE LUMEN EXTRACTION BASKET
Type of Device
FFL, DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET, URETHRAL, METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK ENDOSCOPY
4900 bethania station rd
winston-salem NC 27105
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK ENDOSCOPY
4900 bethania station rd
winston-salem NC 27105
Manufacturer Contact
scottie fariole
4900 bethania station rd
winston-salem, NC 27105
3367440157
MDR Report Key7958293
MDR Text Key125440204
Report Number1037905-2018-00477
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FFL
UDI-Device Identifier00827002251496
UDI-Public(01)00827002251496(17)210706(10)W4087044
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/11/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/06/2021
Device Model NumberG25149
Device Catalogue NumberMB-35-2X4-8
Device Lot NumberW4087044
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/17/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/17/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/06/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-