• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems No Device Output (1435); Unable to Obtain Readings (1516); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Battery Problem (2885); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer's representative and a consumer regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient's ins was dead and had been jumpstarted.Once they charged the ins, eos occurred.The representative was able to read the battery to get programming however they were unable to turn the ins on.Impedances were checked and they showed as "xxx".The patient noted that coverage was good prior to letting the battery die.They had injections which were helping with their pain so they didn't charge the ins.The ins always helped with their legs more than their back and they were unable to try high frequency settings due to the recharging burden.They planned to refer the patient to their physician for a battery replacement- surgical intervention was planned but not yet scheduled.No further complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturing representative (rep).It was reported that the ins was overdischarged.The suspected cause of the eos was that ins being overdischarged for the 3rd time.Surgery has not been scheduled.Ins will be returned at the physicians discretion.Information has been confirmed.No patient symptoms or complications were reported in this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the representative.It was reported that the ins was replaced on (b)(6) 2019, and they were unable to return the ins for analysis as the hospital didn't allow the representative to have possession of the battery.No further complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient reporting that the patient was due to get their ins replaced on (b)(6) 2019.They were asked the reason for their replacement and they stated that ¿it was a little shorter than typically, but not a whole lot¿.It was asked why the patient¿s current ins would need to be replaced since its normal life was nine years.They stated that it was because the ¿ins was dead¿ and they stated that it had been overdischarged too many times.They were asked when it was determined that it no longer was working and the patient then became upset with all the questions (event date was asked but was unknown).It was indicated that the patient was going to get a primary cell battery and wanted to know if their current leads were compatible and it was reviewed that as long as the leads were still viable then they would be compatible.They stated that they were getting preoperative testing next week to see if the leads were still good.The patient stated that they were having trouble getting insurance to approve and did leave a message with the rep.The patient was redirected to follow-up with the healthcare provider (hcp).The event dates of the overdischarges and the issue of the ins no longer working were asked but were unknown.No response has been received at this time.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7964991
MDR Text Key123701550
Report Number3004209178-2018-22982
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/19/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/15/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2015
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/11/2019
Date Device Manufactured06/10/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-