Catalog Number 1550350-28 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Advance (2524); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In (1204)
|
Event Date 10/09/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device remains in the patient.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily tortuous, heavily calcified proximal right coronary artery (rca).Through radial access, a 3.5x28mm xience sierra stent delivery system (sds) was advanced through the guiding catheter in a downward takeoff and then went up and down.Resistance was felt with the anatomy as it was very tortuous and caused the gc to back out.The stent then dislodged in the ostium of the rca and movement of the gc caused the stent to migrate into the aorta, where it remained on the guide wire.It was attempted to be snared out through the radial artery but the stent got stuck in the subcutaneous tissue and became crushed flat during snaring attempt and consequently embedded.Through groin access, two 3.5x12mm xience sierra stents were placed in the proximal and ostial rca to successfully complete the procedure.The patient remained with good pulse and continues in stable condition.It is unknown if the stent will be retrieved.Per the physicians opinion, inadequate guide wire support and tortuous anatomy contributed to stent dislodgement.There was no adverse patient sequela reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|