Results: the ruby coil had multiple kinks at approximately 5.0 cm, 26.5 cm, 37.0 cm, and 76.0 cm from the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The device also had multiple bends approximately 8.5 ¿ 11.0 cm and 116.0 ¿ 127.0 cm from the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The introducer sheath was backwards on the pusher assembly.The proximal pet lock was intact.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The embolization coil had stretched platinum coil winds on its proximal end.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned ruby coil revealed kinks and bends along the length of the pusher assembly.If the pusher assembly is forcefully manipulated outside the patient body during attempts to retract the coil, the pusher assembly may become kinked.Further evaluation revealed the introducer sheath was on backwards and the embolization coil was damaged.It is likely the returned embolization coil damage, improper orientation of the introducer sheath, and some of the returned kinks were incidental and occurred during packaging for return to penumbra.The lantern identified in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician placed a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern) in the target vessel.While attempting to deploy a ruby coil in the target vessel the microcatheter kicked out of place, therefore, the lantern and ruby coil were removed.Upon removal, the pusher wire on the ruby coil was found to be kinked.The procedure was completed using a new ruby coil with the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|