Catalog Number 03.010.368 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problems
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 10/21/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.(b)(4).A review of the device history records has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that a proximal femoral nail antirotaion (pfna) was used on an orthopedic procedure on (b)(6) 2018.During insertion of the right nail and guide wire, the lateral cortex was drilled and tried to ream the femur head but the reamer broke.The implant was changed into a2fn recon and tried to find the optimum position for recon hip screw, while drilling for recon hip screw, the drill bit was broken.The implant was changed again to a standard locking a2fn.It is unknown how the surgery was completed.The procedure was delayed four hours and required prolonged anesthesia on the patient.This complaint is for one (1) reamer.Concomitant device reported: unknown drill guide: (part# unknown, lot# unknown, quantity# 1).Unknown nail (part# unknown, lot# unknown, quantity# 1).Unknown guide wire (part# unknown, lot# unknown, quantity# 1).This complaint involves three (3) devices.This report is 1 of 3 for (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that patient underwent a procedure to implant the proximal femoral nail antirotation (pfna) nail on (b)(6) 2018.During the procedure, the guide wire was inserted, the lateral cortex was drilled, and surgeon attempted to ream the femur head when the reamer broke.Surgical plan was changed to implant the a2fn reconstruction nail.Surgeon attempted to find the optimum position for the reconstruction hip screw but the drill bit broke while drilling for the hip screw.Surgeon then changed to a standard locking a2fn nail.Surgery was delayed approximately four (4) hours, requiring prolonged anesthesia for the patient.Concomitant devices: nail (part unknown, lot unknown, quantity 1), guide wire (part unknown, lot unknown, quantity 1), drill guide (part unknown, lot unknown, quantity 1).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device history records review was completed for part: 03.010.368, lot: u184277.Manufacturing location: selzach, release to warehouse date: aug 23, 2013.The device history record shows this lot was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.The material was reviewed, and the hardness value was confirmed to meet the specification with no non-conformance noted.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.H3, h6: product investigation was completed.The entire tip with two different diameters is broken off.The broken off portion is not available for investigation.At the remaining working end, the reamer ø4.5/6.5 l450 f/hip screw f/expert shows damage and excessive wear on all cutting edges.The received condition agree with the complaint description and the complaint therefore is confirmed.The material was reviewed and the hardness value was confirmed to meet the specification with no non-conformance noted.The used material was stainless steel as required.The hardness was with 53.76 hrc within the specification of 50 hrc +5/0.The received condition agree with the complaint description and the complaint therefore is confirmed.The visual defects on the five years old reamer coincide and provide evidence that at the time of surgery the device was subjected to mechanical overloading.The existing burrs even on the cutting part of the drill flank prove that the drill was also used in the opposite and therefore wrong counterclockwise direction of rotation.We consider that the reamer broke during a mechanical overloading situation.Based on our investigations a product related fault can be excluded.The reamers 03.010.368 are multi use instruments, therefore, the condition of the cutting blades prior to the operation in question is unknown.The important information leaflet describes the recommended instrument inspections for reprocessing operations before reusable device operations.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is appropriate.H11 corrected data: g4: this date was inadvertently reported as 10/21/2018 in the follow up report mwr-19112018-0000247202.The correct date is 11/20/2018.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|