The returned valve was patent.
The valve met the requirements of the reflux, siphon, and valve flux testing.
It did not meet the requirements for leak, pressure-flow and preimplantation testing.
The valve did not spontaneously change levels during the course of analysis; therefore, the complaint could not be reproduced by the laboratory technicians.
The valve did not meet the requirements for leak testing due to a tear/cut in the casing of the delta chamber.
There was also damage on the flange.
It is unknown how or when this damage occurred.
The ifu cautions that, ¿improper use of instruments in the handling or implantation of shunt products may result in the cutting, slitting or crushing of components.
Such damage may lead to loss of shunt integrity.
¿ there was proteinaceous debris observed on the interior and exterior of the valve.
The ifu cautions that, ¿care must be taken to ensure that particulate contaminants are not introduced into shunt components during preimplantation testing or handling.
Introduction of contaminants could result in improper performance of the shunt system.
¿ all valves are 100% tested at the time of manufacture.
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|