(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
(b)(4).The device was initially reported as returning for analysis, but has now been reported as not returning because it was discarded at the account.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.It should be noted that the armada 35 instruction for use states: the device is intended for dilatation of lesions in the renal, iliac, femoral, popliteal, tibial, and peroneal arteries and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.This device is also indicated for stent post-dilatation in the peripheral vasculature.It could not be determined if the off-label use contributed to the balloon rupture.Based on the information provided, the balloon rupture appears to be due to case circumstances.It is likely that the rupture occurred due to interaction with the lesion or associated devices causing damage to the outer surface.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|