Catalog Number 482802745 |
Device Problem
Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 11/03/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Patient experienced pain some time after surgery.A screw which had been implanted had fractured.There was no issue with the original procedure, and there has not been a revision surgery.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient experienced pain some time after surgery.A screw which had been implanted had fractured.There was no issue with the original procedure, and there has not been a revision surgery.A further information received from the sales rep on 01/30/2019 (pr id: (b)(4)), the patient was revised to remove the screw and fixation extension.The tip of the broken screw was left in the patient body.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Method: visual inspection, product history review, complaint history review, nc/capa history review, labelling review, risk assessment.Result: the reported event was confirmed via visual inspection.The tip was not returned as it still implanted in the patient as it could not be removed during the revision surgery.Per email correspondence, there were no complications during the initial surgery.The surgical technique states that the surgeon must warn the patient that the device cannot and does not replicate the flexibility, strength, reliability or durability of normal healthy bone, that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma, and that the device may need to be replaced in the future.If the patient is involved in an occupation or activity which applies inordinate stress upon the implant (e.G., substantial walking, running, lifting, or muscle strain) the surgeon must advise the patient that resultant forces can cause failure of the device.Conclusion: tip not able to be retrieved from the patient during revision surgery indicate that the patient might have hard bone quality.It is also possible that screw hole was not prepared adequately, screw trajectory was incorrect or it was driven too deep inside the bone.High level post-op activity and unstable construct can also contribute to the event.However, the exact root cause could not be determined.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient experienced pain some time after surgery.A screw which had been implanted had fractured.There was no issue with the original procedure, and there has not been a revision surgery.A further information received from the sales rep on 01/30/2019 (pr id: 2001113), the patient was revised to remove the screw and fixation extension.The tip of the broken screw was left in the patient body.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reportable event type: updated to serious injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Method: nc/capa history review, labelling review, risk assessment result: the reported event was confirmed via email correspondence with the sales rep.No device was returned (still implanted) and lot# was not provided.Therefore, device evaluation, complaint history review could not be performed.Conclusion: based on the information available, the exact root cause could not be determined.Device still implanted in the patient.
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient experienced pain some time after surgery.A screw which had been implanted had fractured.There was no issue with the original procedure, and there has not been a revision surgery.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|