Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-FEM |
Device Problems
Insufficient Information (3190); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Disability (2371); No Information (3190)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
|
Event Description
|
It is alleged that the plaintiff received a gunther filter on (b)(6) 2006.It is alleged that the plaintiff was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested but not yet provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2006 due to deep vein thrombosis in both legs and pulmonary embolism.The patient is alleging tilt and vena cava perforation.The patient further alleges shortness of breath, air bubbles accompanied by pain, hospitalization due to blood pressure dropping (2016) and problems walking distances.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information provided at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation - evaluation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating ¿gunther tulip filter implanted".Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Catalog and lot# are unknown, but the filter tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information provided at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information.Investigation :it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information provided to date via the operative note stating "tulip: tilt, vena cava perforation, shortness of breath, air bubbles, pain, limited mobility, hospitalization-updated sfc." cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Vena cava wall perforation is a known potential complication of vena cava filters.Both symptomatic and asymptomatic events have been reported.Among other causes, vena cava wall perforation may inadvertently be initiated by improper deployment, excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical procedure in the vicinity of a filter) and (or) procedures that involve other devices being passed through an in situ filter.There is a current debate in the published scientific literature on a differentiation between ivc wall perforation with and without clinical sequelae.E.G.Filter legs may be outside the contrast lumen on imaging without actually perforating the ivc wall (known as tenting) and with no clinical sequelae.In contrast, perforation of adjacent organs is reported with clinical sequelae.Filter tilt is a known risk in relation to filter implant reported in the published scientific literature and may occur during placement or during implanting period.Unknown if the reported pain and sob are directly related to the filter.Unknown if the reported air bubbles, limited mobility, hospitalization are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.No relevant notes on neither device or lot number.Product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|