The device has not been returned, at this time, to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak in the picc was confirmed, and it appeared that the damage was associated with used of the device.One 6fr triple lumen powerpicc solo was returned for investigation.The catheter extended to the 53cm depth mark.A 1.5cm long slit was observed in the tubing at the 5cm depth mark.The slit exposed the power injectable lumen.A microscopic examination of the slit revealed that the adjoining surfaces of the tubing were striated and the edges of the tubing along the slit were sharp and clearly defined.The observed damage is consistent with the tubing being cut with a sharp instrument.Since use residue was observed in the catheter, it appears that the damage occurred while the picc was in place.It was reported that the split was discovered when the dressing was to be done.The product ifu indicates that accidental device contact with sharp instruments should be avoided.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|