(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported balloon rupture was confirmed.The resistance was unable to be confirmed as it was based on case circumstances.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.Based on the information provided, the reported difficulties appear to be due to operational circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily calcified anterior tibial artery that did not have any tortuosity.A 2.5 x 200 mm armada 14 balloon catheter was used.However, the device met initial resistance with the anatomy during advancement, and the balloon ruptured at 8 atmospheres during the first inflation.Therefore, another unspecified armada balloon catheter was used to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|