(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined that the reported balloon rupture appears to be related to case circumstances.The balloon rupture was likely the result of interaction with the heavily calcified lesion.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|