• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 2.7 DEGREE ANGLED SAGITAL SAW; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. 2.7 DEGREE ANGLED SAGITAL SAW; STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 212480
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Non Reproducible Results (4029)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/19/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
¿as part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.¿.
 
Event Description
Stryker rep reported that the part failed during surgery.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation.Surgical delay 50 minutes.Update: mr (b)(6) undertook his first ever tka earlier today.The case was going to plan until they were preparing to execute bone resections with the mako.When engaging power on the mics handpiece there was a quiet sound coming from the mics handpiece rather than the usual loud saw noise.Mako specialist troubleshot the mics and also the offset saw attachment (212480).Specialist tried the straight saw attachment, and this functioned properly.Then tried a new mics power tool with the suspect offset saw and again this failed.Due to hospital factors the second attachment kit was unavailable so the decision was made to convert to a manual (depuy pfc) knee replacement.This saw attachment has only ever been used once before.Not aware of any follow up intervention or adverse patient outcomes.
 
Event Description
Stryker rep reported that the part failed during surgery.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation surgical delay 50 minutes.Mr (b)(6) undertook his first ever tka earlier today.The case was going to plan until they were preparing to execute bone resections with the mako.When engaging power on the mics handpiece there was a quiet sound coming from the mics handpiece rather than the usual loud saw noise.Mako specialist trouble shot the mics and also the offset saw attachment (212480).Specialist tried the straight saw attachment, and this functioned properly.Then tried a new mics power tool with the suspect offset saw and again this failed.Due to hospital factors the second attachment kit was unavailable so the decision was made to convert to a manual (depuy pfc) knee replacement.This saw attachment has only ever been used once before.Surgical delay of 50 minutes.Not aware of any follow up intervention or adverse patient outcomes.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: stryker rep reported that the part failed during surgery.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation surgical delay 50 minutes.Update: mr (b)(6) undertook his first ever tka earlier today.The case was going to plan until they were preparing to execute bone resections with the mako.When engaging power on the mics handpiece there was a quiet sound coming from the mics handpiece rather than the usual loud saw noise.Mako specialist trouble shot the mics and also the offset saw attachment (212480).Specialist tried the straight saw attachment, and this functioned properly.Then tried a new mics power tool with the suspect offset saw and again this failed.Due to hospital factors the second attachment kit was unavailable so the decision was made to convert to a manual (depuy pfc) knee replacement.This saw attachment has only ever been used once before.Surgical delay of 50 minutes.Not aware of any follow up intervention or adverse patient outcomes.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation functional inspection: functional inspection could not be performed because the product was not returned.Visual inspection: visual inspection could not be performed because the product was not returned.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection could not be performed because the product was not returned.Material analysis: material analysis could not be performed because the product was not returned.Product history review: product history review respectively shows the number of devices manufactured, devices that failed inspection, and their nc/npr/qt numbers if applicable.Date inspected: 05-09-2018, devices manufactured: 42, devices failed inspection: 13, nc/npr/qt numbers: qt18-05-0030.Product history review shows the non-conformance(s) is/are not related to the failure alleged in this complaint.Complaint history review: a review of complaints related to p/n: 212480, lot number: 35060118 shows no additional complaint(s) related to the failure in this investigation.Complaints related to p/n: 212480 will be tracked by trend request# 1191.Conclusion: the failure mode could not be confirmed because the part was not available for evaluation.If device and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.Corrective action/preventive action: no action is required at this time as there is no indication to suggest a product non-conformity or unanticipated hazard.
 
Event Description
Stryker rep reported that the part failed during surgery.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation surgical delay 50 minutes update: mr (b)(6) undertook his first ever tka earlier today.The case was going to plan until they were preparing to execute bone resections with the mako.When engaging power on the mics handpiece there was a quiet sound coming from the mics handpiece rather than the usual loud saw noise.Mako specialist trouble shot the mics and also the offset saw attachment (212480).Specialist tried the straight saw attachment, and this functioned properly.Then tried a new mics power tool with the suspect offset saw and again this failed.Due to hospital factors the second attachment kit was unavailable so the decision was made to convert to a manual (depuy pfc) knee replacement.This saw attachment has only ever been used once before.Surgical delay of 50 minutes.Not aware of any follow up intervention or adverse patient outcomes.Tka was completed using traditional instrumentation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2.7 DEGREE ANGLED SAGITAL SAW
Type of Device
STEREOTAXIC DEVICE, ROBOTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key8205126
MDR Text Key131926228
Report Number3005985723-2018-00802
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier00848486032128
UDI-Public00848486032128
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K143752
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/30/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/28/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number212480
Device Lot Number3503178/35060118
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/28/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-