Ps journal published (2017) "the comparison of strattice and surgimend in acellular dermal matrix¿assisted, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction." the aim of this study was to compare strattice and surgimend for postoperative clinical outcomes following immediate, implant-based breast reconstruction.Methods: the study, conducted across three hospitals, included all patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using strattice and surgimend.The primary outcome measure was implant loss rate.Secondary outcome measures included acellular dermal matrix loss rate, seroma formation, and minor and major complication rates.Intergroup comparison was performed.Strattice (porcine derivative) and surgimend (bovine derivative) are the two most common acellular dermal matrices used in breast reconstruction in the united kingdom.This retrospective study compared clinical outcomes in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction patients.Eighty-two patients (strattice, n = 45; surgimend, n = 37) underwent 97 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions (strattice, n = 54; surgimend, n = 43).Postoperative outcomes for surgimend: implants loss within 3 months - 3 (wound breakdown 1; infection 2).Local complications: postoperative complication - 21, seroma - 20 - (5 seromas drained), hematoma - 5, skin flap problems - 10, nipple-areola problems - 5, red breast - 9, other minor complications - 3.Infections outcomes: implant infection - 2, wound infection - 9, therapeutic antibiotics - 12, reoperation - 3 - reason for reoperation: removal of implant and washout (2); removal of implant, washout and insertion of expander (1).Results: there were no differences between groups for age, comorbidities, specimen weight, or implant volume.Drains were used in all strattice and 36 (84 percent) surgimend cases.The implant loss rate was higher for strattice compared with surgimend, but failed to reach statistical significance.The acellular dermal matrix loss rate was significantly higher in the strattice group, with no acellular dermal matrix loss with surgimend.The reoperation rate was also significantly higher in the strattice group.The incidence of red breast was significantly higher in the surgimend group.Seroma, wound problems, and infection rates were similar.Conclusions: clinical outcomes, including implant loss, acellular dermal matrix loss, and reoperation rates, are significantly better when using surgimend in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction compared with strattice.
|