• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG ENDURO MENISCAL COMPONENT F3 12MM; GLIDING SURFACES/PATELLAS ENDU

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG ENDURO MENISCAL COMPONENT F3 12MM; GLIDING SURFACES/PATELLAS ENDU Back to Search Results
Model Number NR891
Device Problem Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 01/11/2019
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Height 178cm.When additional information is received a follow up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the healthcare professional "on (b)(6) 2011, the patient had right knee prosthesis with an enduro device.Following hip tep implantation on the right hip, on (b)(6) 2018, during a physiotherapeutic treatment the patient felt a crack with subsequent instability in the area of the right knee joint.The patient was seen for doctor consultation on (b)(6) 2018.After appropriate diagnostics a revision of the knee prosthesis was performed." components in use listed as concomitant medical products are: nr891, enduro meniscal component f3 12mm (this report / leading material); nb019k, enduro femoral component cemented f3r; nr172k, tibia offset stem d12x92mm cementless; nb012k, enduro tibial comp.Offset cemented t2; nr410k, femur extens.Stem 5° d20x117mm cem.Less; nr400k, nut f/femur extens.Stem all sizes neutr; refobacin bone cement r40 btl/2.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: the components were examined visually and microscopically with a keyence vhx-5000 digital microscope and a panasonic dmc tz8 digital camera.It was found that the rotation axis has fractured below the taper.The taper of the rotation axis shows visible damage on the surface.The rotation axis locknut is no longer located/fixed on the thread of the axis.The breakage surface of the larger distal part of the axis as well as the proximal fragment show so called arrest lines which are typical for a dynamic fatigue fracture.Both fracture surfaces exhibit no material defects like foreign particles, inclusions, or blow holes.The thread of the rotation axis as well as the thread of the rotation axis locknut shows no visible damages.It was determined that the meniscal component exhibits several signs of wear (not unusual for 7 years implanted).The gliding surface shows anterior visible delaminations.The locking ring and the bearing for rotation axis show no unusual damages.The available x-ray figures do not provide any hints for the rotation axis fracture cause.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all available lot numbers and found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.No similar incidents have been filed with products from the batch.Conclusion and root cause: based on the information available, as well as the results of our investigation, the root cause of the failure is probably patient/usage related.Rationale: according to the quality standard and dhr files a material defect and production error can be excluded.Furthermore there are not hints of a material or manufacturing problem.The fracture surface exhibit no material defects like foreign particles inclusions or blow holes.We assume that the fracture appears to have occurred due to a patient related mechanical overload situation.It could be possible that the mentioned physiotherapeutic treatment because of the hip tep implantation intensified a mechanical overload situation.Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the visible damages on the taper of the rotation axis could be an indication that the hinge connection of the femur has been moving on the taper.No capa is necessary.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDURO MENISCAL COMPONENT F3 12MM
Type of Device
GLIDING SURFACES/PATELLAS ENDU
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
MDR Report Key8294853
MDR Text Key134733460
Report Number9610612-2019-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K101815
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/21/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/31/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/01/2014
Device Model NumberNR891
Device Catalogue NumberNR891
Device Lot Number51598095
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date02/15/2019
Device Age10 YR
Date Manufacturer Received02/15/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
NB012K, ENDURO TIBIAL; NB019K, ENDURO FEMORAL; NR172K, TIBIA OFFSET STEM; NR400K, NUT F/FEMUR; NR410K, FEMUR EXTENS; NR891, ENDURO MENISCAL; REFOBACIN BONE CEMENT R40 BTL/2
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient Weight125
-
-