Multiple follow-ups were conducted to obtain additional information and device for evaluation; however, the office has not provided event information or returned device back for evaluation.Once the evaluation of the event is completed or new information is obtained, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
The device was manufactured per patient's prescription (rx) and returned for an analysis.A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The edges of the device were very smooth.No major cracks were found and the layers were intact.The original color was maintained without discoloration.The device was returned very clean and in good condition.There was no white deposits or cell debris present with the device.All accessories were inspected and were confirmed to be intact.A review of the material lot was performed and no non-conformance's were found.A series of testing were performed on a similar device.The device (model variant) was evaluated for cytotoxicity, skin irritation, delayed dermal contact sensitization and oral mucosal irritation.The test article showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity.There was no erythema nor edema observed.There was no evidence of the device causing delayed dermal contact sensitization, nor oral mucosal irritation.There were no device problems found with the test article.However based on the reported information, the patient has a known chromium allergy.The device contains chromium (20-30%); therefore, basing on patient factors, there is a possibility that the patient's reaction occurred due to their sensitivity/allergy to chromium.This incident is being monitored, tracked, and trended.
|