• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. DREAMTAP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC. DREAMTAP Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Itching Sensation (1943); Rash (2033); Tingling (2171); Reaction (2414)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Multiple follow-ups were conducted to obtain additional information and device for evaluation; however, the office has not provided event information or returned device back for evaluation.Once the evaluation of the event is completed or new information is obtained, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a patient experienced an allergic reaction after using the dreamtap nightguard.The patient complained of itching and dry mouth.The patient also had rash on lips and "a tingling feeling".The patient has known chromium allergy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was manufactured per patient's prescription (rx) and returned for an analysis.A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The edges of the device were very smooth.No major cracks were found and the layers were intact.The original color was maintained without discoloration.The device was returned very clean and in good condition.There was no white deposits or cell debris present with the device.All accessories were inspected and were confirmed to be intact.A review of the material lot was performed and no non-conformance's were found.A series of testing were performed on a similar device.The device (model variant) was evaluated for cytotoxicity, skin irritation, delayed dermal contact sensitization and oral mucosal irritation.The test article showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity.There was no erythema nor edema observed.There was no evidence of the device causing delayed dermal contact sensitization, nor oral mucosal irritation.There were no device problems found with the test article.However based on the reported information, the patient has a known chromium allergy.The device contains chromium (20-30%); therefore, basing on patient factors, there is a possibility that the patient's reaction occurred due to their sensitivity/allergy to chromium.This incident is being monitored, tracked, and trended.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DREAMTAP
Type of Device
DREAMTAP
Manufacturer (Section D)
PRISMATIK DENTALCRAFT, INC.
2212 dupont drive
suite p
irvine CA 92612
MDR Report Key8368657
MDR Text Key137113523
Report Number3011649314-2019-00019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LRK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K061732
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/31/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/25/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/06/2019
Date Manufacturer Received05/30/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-