CRYOLIFE, INC. ¿ KENNESAW PHOTOFIX DECELLULARIZED BOVINE PERICARDIUM; PATCH, PLEDGET AND INTRACARDIAC, PETP, PTFE, POLYPROPYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number PFP 6X8 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
Thrombus (2101)
|
Event Date 02/27/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to initial reports, patient experienced hypersensitivity thought to be attributed to photofix.Date of implant (b)(6) 2018.Additional information received.The patient ended up having a large clot form on the inter-atrial baffle patch during the month of dec despite being on therapeutic coumadin.The clot had to be surgically removed in (b)(6) 2019.Then, despite running his inr even higher in the inr 2.5-4 range on coumadin with 325 mg aspirin, the growth has continued to grow on his atrial baffle and it changes every week, so we now have to remove the entire baffle for take down to use a different type of patch material.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing records for pfp 6x8 lot number 11062618 were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.A review of the available information was performed.According to initial reports, patient experienced hypersensitivity thought to be attributed to photofix.Date of implant (b)(6) 2018.¿the patient ended up having a large clot form on the inter-atrial baffle patch during the month of december despite being on therapeutic coumadin and the clot was removed early (b)(6) 2019.The clot had to be surgically removed in january.Then despite running his inr even higher since then in the inr 2.5-4 range on coumadin with 325 mg aspirin the growth has continued to grow on his atrial baffle and it changes every week, so we now have to remove the entire baffle for take down to use a different type of patch material.This is why we want to test the bovine patch to his skin and see what happens since we do not understand why this baffle is developing this growth/thickening/clot like formation despite supra therapeutic inr levels.Additional information including patient medical history and surgical notes are not available for consideration in this complaint evaluation.Details surrounding the patient¿s post-operative recovery are also unknown.Patch testing was negative for both bovine and vortex patches.While this doesn¿t mean there was no immunologic reason for the clotting (this patch testing has obviously not been standardized), there is no evidence of an obvious hypersensitivity.No tissue was returned for evaluation.Photofix is contraindicated in patients that exhibit sensitivity to materials of bovine origin.Based on pre-clinical data, biocompatibility testing, published literature, and experience data, as well as the ongoing risk mitigation and post market surveillance activities, photofix performs safely with an acceptable benefit/risk profile in the appropriate patient population.The relationship between the patient¿s symptoms and photofix cannot be determined without additional information.The specific signs/symptoms that suggested an allergic reaction are unknown; however the negative skin test suggests that a hypersensitivity to the patch is unlikely.The presence of ¿a clot¿ adjacent to the patch is non-specific and does not suggest an inherent problem with the patch.Thrombus may form as a result of turbulent blood flow, however echocardiographic data regarding blood flow pattern around the baffle is not available.Root cause for this event is unknown.No further action is warranted at this time.This report is being submitted as required by federal regulations and does not constitute an admission that the device caused or contributed to the reported event.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
|
|
Event Description
|
According to initial reports, patient experienced hypersensitivity thought to be attributed to photofix.Date of implant (b)(6) 2018.Additional information received.The patient ended up having a large clot form on the inter-atrial baffle patch during the month of dec despite being on therapeutic coumadin.The clot had to be surgically removed in (b)(6) 2019.Then, despite running his inr even higher in the inr 2.5-4 range on coumadin with 325 mg aspirin, the growth has continued to grow on his atrial baffle and it changes every week, so we now have to remove the entire baffle for take down to use a different type of patch material.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|