It was reported that the progav hydrocephalus valve was blocked.The patient originally underwent implantation on (b)(6) 2018.Sometime later, it was noted that the valve was blocked.Therefore, on (b)(6) 2019, the device was explanted.Additional information such as patient outcome and medical history have been requested.
|
Manufacturing evaluation: the shunt system was received submersed in an unidentified liquid in a plastic container.Visual inspection - no significant deformations or damage of the valves were detected during the inspection.Permeability test - results have shown that the shunt assistant has a blockage and that the progav is permeable.Adjustment test - the valve was tested and was adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and function test - the results have shown that the brake function is fully operational and that the braking force is within the given tolerances.Results - after the tests, we have dismantled the valves.Inside the progav we have found slight deposits (likely protein).No visible deposits were seen inside the shunt assistant.Based on our investigation, we confirm the presence of occlusion in the shunt assistant valve.Despite the lack of visible deposits, it is possible that even small amounts of non-visible blood or protein inside the valves can impair the functionality of the valve and lead to the observed failure.As described in our literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hydrocephalus (hc) therapy by shunt implants.We can exlude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
|