It was reported that a newborn patient was born via ¿normal birth¿ and the doctor used the device before the delivery time for monitoring of the fetal heart.
A month after discharge from hospital, was readmitted to the neonatal exam room for a head echography, as the newborn presented an under-cutaneous neoformation similar to an atheroma.
The impression was confirmed by the results of the echography and visual-tactile examination as the cyst was mobile compared to lower layers and not painful at touch.
After another month, the mother brought back the newborn to the er because some ¿substance/material¿ was oozing from the cyst.
In the er the surgeon removed, with surgical tweezers, some spiral shaped metallic fragments compatible with the scalp electrode.
A return material authorization was issued for the return of the device involved in the incident for evaluation.
Philips was advised that the hospital team was not aware of the occurrence of the broken electrode.
Therefore, the device was not retained.
Additional information was requested, but the distributor was unable to confirm how this had occurred.
Therefore, we are considering this a malfunction of cause unknown for reporting purposes only.
|