Model Number 26102 |
Device Problems
Deflation Problem (1149); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problems
Hematoma (1884); Tissue Damage (2104); Perforation of Vessels (2135); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/08/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Event date was not provided.(b)(6) 2019 was used as the event date as the aware date was 11 mar 2019.Device is combination product.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a balloon could not be deflated.The 7mm x 40mm, 135 cm ranger dcb balloon was used but could not be deflated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event: correction.Event: updated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a balloon could not be deflated.An intervention was being performed on a 75% stenotic left femoral artery.The 7mm x 40mm, 135 cm ranger dcb balloon was inflated with an encore 26 inflator and a platinium guidewire.Once the lesion was treated, the balloon could not be deflated.The balloon was forcibly removed from the patient.The patient did not experience any major complications with the exception of a hematoma at the puncture site and possibly some damage to the humeral artery.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a balloon could not be deflated.An intervention was being performed on a 75% stenotic left femoral artery.The 7mm x 40mm, 135 cm ranger dcb balloon was inflated with an encore 26 inflator and a platinium guidewire.Once the lesion was treated, the balloon could not be deflated.The balloon was forcibly removed from the patient.The patient did not experience any major complications with the exception of a hematoma at the puncture site and possibly some damage to the humeral artery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: the tip, balloon, proximal bond and inner/outer shafts were microscopically and visually inspected.The device was received with contrast inside the balloon and inflation lumen (outer shaft), with the balloon loosely folded.Inspection revealed a complete separation in the shaft located 99.4cm from the tip of the device, with the entire distal shaft (separated end of the device) was damaged (stretched/flattened), and numerous kinks in the shaft.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.Functional testing could not be done, due to the shaft of the device being completely separated.The reported deflation difficulty and removal difficulty could not be confirmed, as the clinical circumstances could not be replicated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|