• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PARIETEX; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS PARIETEX; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number PCO3020X
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abscess (1690); Bacterial Infection (1735); Fistula (1862); Granuloma (1876); Unspecified Infection (1930); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Staphylococcus Aureus (2058); Discharge (2225); Injury (2348); Fluid Discharge (2686); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Code Available (3191); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced infected mesh and 3 draining sinus tracts.Post-operative patient treatment included partial excision of mesh.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced infected mesh and 3 draining sinus tracts.Post-operative patient treatment included partial excision of mesh.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced infected mesh and 3 draining sinus tracts, (abscesses).Post-operative patient treatment included partial excision of mesh.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Additional information: b5, g4, h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic. the fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.  due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced infected mesh, granuloma, foreign body and 3 draining sinus tracts, (abscesses).Post-operative patient treatment included partial excision of mesh, removal of foreign body of abdominal wall and debrided as much mesh as could easily be removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient codes-c64343 (sinus tract) medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced infected mesh, granuloma, foreign body, 3 draining sinus tracts, staphylococcus aureus, and abscesses.Post-operative patient treatment included partial excision of mesh, removal of foreign body of abdominal wall and debrided as much mesh as could easily be removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced pain, infected mesh, granuloma, foreign body, 3 draining sinus tracts, staphylococcus aureus, and abscesses.Post-operative patient treatment included partial excision of mesh, removal of foreign body of abdominal wall and debrided as much mesh as could easily be removed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: a4, b5, b7, g1(manufacturer name, first name, last name, street 1, city, region, postal code, email, phone), h6(patient codes), additional codes.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ventral hernia.It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced pain, infected mesh, granuloma, foreign body, 3 draining sinus tracts, staphylococcus aureus, fistulas, inflammation, and abscesses.Post-operative patient treatment included medication, debridement, partial excision of mesh, removal of foreign body of abdominal wall and debrided as much mesh as could easily be removed.Relevant tests/laboratory data: (b)(6) 2012: tissue culture with gram stain showed rare staphylococcus aureus.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PARIETEX
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR  01600
Manufacturer (Section G)
SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
116 avenue du formans
trevoux 01600
FR   01600
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
5920 longbow drive
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view,mn, CO 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key8487149
MDR Text Key141049128
Report Number9615742-2019-01032
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K110815
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/05/2019
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2015
Device Model NumberPCO3020X
Device Catalogue NumberPCO3020X
Device Lot NumberPKG00617
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age34 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight129 KG
-
-